New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P0847 Deducing this #115
Comments
We've seen this before in EWG, but looks like EWG is short on time for KOA. Tagging for EWGI help. |
We want a feature to drive deduction to deducing to a specific type. |
EWG saw this: http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/P0847-EWG Do we encourage further work on P0847, specially wording and implementation?
|
P0847R4 Deducing this (Gašper Ažman, Simon Brand, Ben Deane, Barry Revzin) |
P0847R5 Deducing this (Barry Revzin, Gašper Ažman, Sy Brand, Ben Deane) |
Discussed in today's EWG telecon. POLL: A paper separate from P0847r6 (from potentially separate authors) should explore treating the explicit
POLL: P0847r6 should explore the usage of
POLL: P0847r6 should allow taking the address of
POLL: P0847r6 deducing this is tentatively ready to be voted on through EWG electronic polling (assuming my favored outcome to the above poll is achieved).
Please also mention packs and coroutines in the updated paper. |
P0847R6 Deducing this (Barry Revzin, Gašper Ažman, Sy Brand, Ben Deane) |
The two requested updates were done, Barry will follow up on the mailing list, we can poll this next round. |
This was voted on in the EWG May 2021 polling period, and received consensus. Poll: Forward P0847r6 "Deducing this" to Core for C++23.
|
2021-07-12: CWG teleconference: Approved for plenary vote. |
P0847R7 Deducing this (Barry Revzin, Gašper Ažman, Sy Brand, Ben Deane) |
Adopted 2021-10. |
P0847R2 Deducing this (Gašper Ažman, Simon Brand, Ben Deane, Barry Revzin)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: