Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

P1609 C++ Should Support Just-in-Time Compilation #388

Open
wg21bot opened this issue Mar 20, 2019 · 9 comments
Open

P1609 C++ Should Support Just-in-Time Compilation #388

wg21bot opened this issue Mar 20, 2019 · 9 comments
Labels
EWG Evolution needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed
Projects
EWG-I in Cologne 2019 EWG-I Prague

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

wg21bot commented Mar 20, 2019

P1609R0 C++ Should Support Just-in-Time Compilation (Hal Finkel)
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2019-07 milestone Mar 20, 2019
@wg21bot wg21bot added the EWGI Evolution Incubator label Mar 20, 2019
@robert-andrzejuk

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@hfinkel

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wg21bot commented Jun 23, 2019

P1609R1 C++ Should Support Just-in-Time Compilation (Hal Finkel)

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to Tuesday in EWG-I in Cologne 2019 Jul 11, 2019
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

EWGI in Cologne:
Spend committee time on this versus other proposals, given that time is limited?
SF F N A SA
7 9 1 0 0

@jfbastien jfbastien added the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Jul 18, 2019
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2019-07 milestone Aug 24, 2019
@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wg21bot commented Oct 15, 2019

P1609R2 C++ Should Support Just-in-Time Compilation (Hal Finkel)

@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2019-11 milestone Oct 15, 2019
@jfbastien jfbastien removed the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Oct 15, 2019
@theres-waldo theres-waldo added needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed SG7 Reflection labels Nov 7, 2019
@theres-waldo
Copy link
Collaborator

EWG-I in Belfast

Encourage further work on JIT compilation?

SF F N A SA num. attendees
7 8 0 0 0 15

Get a consult from SG7 (Reflection)?
unanimous

Only non-type parameters can be provided at runtime?

SF F N A SA num. attendees
0 2 7 3 1 15

Do we want a syntactic marker on the function template declaration?

SF F N A SA num. attendees
3 3 4 3 0 15

Provide a way to detect at compile time whether JIT is available?

SF F N A SA num. attendees
5 7 2 0 0 15

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2019-11 milestone Dec 12, 2019
@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wg21bot commented Jan 18, 2020

P1609R3 C++ Should Support Just-in-Time Compilation (Hal Finkel)

@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2020-02 milestone Jan 18, 2020
@jfbastien jfbastien removed the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Jan 18, 2020
@theres-waldo theres-waldo added this to Thursday PM in EWG-I Prague Feb 7, 2020
@erichkeane
Copy link
Collaborator

EWGI in Prague

Feedback given to the author, no votes taken.

@erichkeane erichkeane added the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Feb 13, 2020
@hanickadot
Copy link
Collaborator

SG7: We want authors to look for possibilities how to unify the JIT API with the reflection API.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2020-02 milestone Feb 18, 2020
@keryell keryell mentioned this issue Feb 24, 2020
Open
@cor3ntin cor3ntin added the EWG Evolution label Feb 22, 2022
@jfbastien jfbastien removed the EWGI Evolution Incubator label Jun 4, 2023
@hanickadot hanickadot removed the SG7 Reflection label Oct 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
EWG Evolution needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed
Projects
No open projects
EWG-I Prague
Thursday PM
EWG-I in Cologne 2019
Tuesday
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
9 participants
@jfbastien @hfinkel @cor3ntin @hanickadot @theres-waldo @erichkeane @robert-andrzejuk @jensmaurer @wg21bot