Let's have SG1 and EWGI decide if they want this before we design a library API for it.

EWGI In Prague

Given the time constraints of the committee, should we spend additional committee effort on P2069?

We have provided as much feedback to the author of P2069 as we intend to, so we suggest SG18(LEWGI)
review this and consider the library wording.

SG1 in Prague

We want (the author, and us, to spend time on) a thread safe (as far as install/uninstall)
scoped signal handler facility (i.e. the signal handler can return or call abort()).
SF F N A SA
0 8 6 1 0

We want (the author, and us, to spend time on) a signal handler facility that can cleanup
(i.e. can also not return to the protected section, but go elsewhere) (implies having
a solution to the half-updated object problem).
SF F N A SA
1 5 7 1 0

This paper needs revision to address the memory semantics of cleanup (probably comprising an even more aggressive set of prohibitions inside the guarded region, and a less-disruptive language semantic change, ideally none).