New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P0881 A Proposal to add stacktrace library #119
Comments
CWG in Kona: Defer to LEWG with the following concerns (consensus in CWG):
|
Rename stacktrace to backtrace or back_trace. Naming for stacktrace: stacktrace vs. backtrace Naming for stack_frame Prefer stacktraceentry (or backtraceentry). Leave the expensive operations as member functions. We are OK with the fact that N physical entries can become N+X logical entries after decoding (because of expanding inline functions). Forward back to CWG for C++20. |
@tituswinters: "We are OK with the fact that N physical entries can become N+X logical entries after decoding": The API as presented doesn't seem to allow that. |
The API has |
P0881R4 A Proposal to add stacktrace library (Alexey Gorgurov, Antony Polukhin) |
P0881R5 A Proposal to add stacktrace library (Antony Polukhin, Antony Polukhin) |
This was not adopted for C++20. Removing the "C++20" label. |
@jensmaurer is the core label still relevant here? My understanding is that we are down to lwg now? |
@JeffGarland: Correct, CWG is done with it. Is LWG going to move it? Otherwise, we should keep the CWG label. |
I can't say when, but trying to triage our queue and presumed this would be on it since it dropped due to time. I thought normally when CWG was done that tag gets removed, so didn't want to put it on our list if CWG was still doing something. Thanks. |
P0881R6 A Proposal to add stacktrace library (Antony Polukhin, Alexey Gorgurov) |
Catching up the status here -- LWG did an initial review of this which has lead to the R6 updates. https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21summer2020/P0881R5:Stack_trace |
LWG has completed further reviews on 9/04 https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21summer2020/Telecon-20200904 and a final review on 9/11 --> with a vote to move into c++23 working paper Everybody in favor of moving P0881R7 into the C++23 working paper
|
P0881R7 A Proposal to add stacktrace library (Antony Polukhin, Alexey Gorgurov) |
Adopted 2020-11. |
P0881R3 A Proposal to add stacktrace library (Alexey Gorgurov, Antony Polukhin)
https://issues.isocpp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: