New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P1202 Asymmetric Fences #144
Comments
Forward to LEWG for consideration in concurrency TS v2 |
P1202R2 Asymmetric Fences (David Goldblatt) |
LEWG in Prague Forward to LWG for Concurrency TS 2. |
Jens has identified that the version of the paper that Library Evolution forwarded didn't specify which header this was going in; |
P1202R3 Asymmetric Fences (David Goldblatt) |
A Library Evolution motion was made to advance this paper directly to electronic polling. During the discussion, it was pointed out that instead we could simply adopt P2396, as the only issue in P1202 that still needs LEWG attention is the question of which header these things should live in; the rest of the design was previously approved and sent to Prague. So, we'll table this in LEWG for now, and instead look at P2396. |
P1202R4 Asymmetric Fences (David Goldblatt) |
A motion was made on the mailing list to forward to electronic polling for the Concurrency TS v2. The motion passed with 10 votes. |
2022-05 Library Evolution Electronic Poll OutcomesPOLL: Send [P1202R4] Asymmetric Fences to Library Working Group for the Concurrency TS v2, classified as an addition ([P0592R4] bucket 3 item).
Consensus in favor. |
P1202R5 Asymmetric Fences (David Goldblatt) |
This was voted into the Concurrency v2 working paper in Kona 2022, and is present in https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2023/n4953.pdf |
P1202R1 Asymmetric Fences (David Goldblatt)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: