Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P1884 Private Module Partition: An Inconsistent Boundary #729

Closed
wg21bot opened this issue Jan 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

P1884 Private Module Partition: An Inconsistent Boundary #729

wg21bot opened this issue Jan 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
C++20 Targeted at C++20 CWG Core SG2 Modules
Projects
Milestone

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

wg21bot commented Jan 18, 2020

P1884R0 Private Module Partition: An Inconsistent Boundary (Nathan Sidwell)

@wg21bot wg21bot added EWG Evolution SG2 Modules labels Jan 18, 2020
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2020-02 milestone Jan 18, 2020
@jfbastien jfbastien added this to C++20 in EWG Prague Jan 22, 2020
@jfbastien jfbastien moved this from C++20 to Monday in EWG Prague Jan 23, 2020
@jfbastien jfbastien added the C++20 Targeted at C++20 label Jan 23, 2020
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

Discussed in EWG Prague on Monday afternoon.

Entities declared as inline in module interface purview must be defined within the interface.

SF F N A SA
10 10 2 2 0

The paper can go straight to Core if there’s no overlap with other inline-related wording.

Nathan to update paper.

@jfbastien jfbastien added CWG Core and removed EWG Evolution labels Feb 10, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to Ready for review in CWG Feb 10, 2020
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

P1884 was absorbed by P1815 Translation-unit-local entities #586.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from Ready for review in CWG Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C++20 Targeted at C++20 CWG Core SG2 Modules
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants