-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
P1899 stride_view #647
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Discussed by LEWG in Prague. Ensure that stride is positive. Revise (many suggestions in the notes) and return to LEWG. |
R2 of the paper was seen by SG9 on 2021-11-8. (Full Minutes) OutcomePaper should be revised with the design fixes, then come back to SG9 (Scheduled for December 20th meeting). |
P1899R1 stride_view (Christopher Di Bella) |
Was seen by SG9 on Dec 20th, 2021 (Minutes) PollsPoll: Forward “P1899R2: stride_view” (T1) to LEWG for C++23.
SummeryR2 was by Tim Song. No changes requested from the group. |
ML review was started on Dec 20 2021, including motion to pass the paper to electronic poll. |
P1899R2 stride_view (Christopher Di Bella, Tim Song) |
2022-01 Library Evolution Electronic Poll OutcomesSend [P1899R2] (views::stride) to Library Working Group for C++23, classified as an addition ([P0592R4] bucket 3 item)
Unanimous consensus in favor. |
LWG reviewed and approved 2022-07-08 poll: put P1899r3 into C++23
|
P1899R3 stride_view (Christopher Di Bella, Tim Song) |
P1899R0 stride_view (Christopher Di Bella)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: