New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2013 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new #749
Comments
EWG Prague Friday afternoon: We’re interested in freestanding having an optional operator new, please come back with wording.
|
P2013R1 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig) |
This was discussed in an EWG telecon today. POLL: After updating wording for "either/or", mandates, and talking to SG10 about the feature test macro, P2013 is tentatively ready to be forwarded to CWG.
|
P2013R2 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
P2013R3 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig) |
The state of the paper after CWG review is that it touches only LWG wording. Forwarding ownership to LWG. |
Author isn't available to support updates and reviews for c++23 timeline -- re-targeting to c++26. |
LWG reviewed P2013R4 today and approved a modified version, P2013R5, for C++26
|
This is tentatively-ready-for-plenary but I won't add the label, as it can't go to plenary until we actually have a C++26 WP to add it to. |
I've added an lwg-future-plenary for items in this state. |
P2013R5 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig) |
P2013R0 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: