New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2321 zip #1003
Comments
2021-03-03 Library Evolution TeleconP2321R0: 2021-03-30 Library Evolution Telecon Minutes Chair: Nevin Liber Champion: Tim Song Minute Taker: Ben Craig POLL: Use the names adjacent and pairwise as decribed in the paper.
Attendance: 27 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: WF Outcome: Consensus in favor POLL: Add a precondition to iter_swap that there is no overlap.
Attendance: 27 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: WF Outcome: Consensus in favor POLL: Should we forward a revision of P2321R0 with a feature test macro to electronic polling to send to LWG in bucket 3?
Attendance: 24 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: SF Outcome: Consensus in favor SummaryWe had a bit of discussion on how tuple works now, as well as whether or not these should be considered as bug fixes to tuple and pair (they shouldn't). OutcomeConsensus to use the names adjacent and pairwise, add a precondition to iter_swap of non-overlap, and a revision of this paper should be forwarded to electronic polling to add to LWG bucket 3. |
P2321R1 zip (Tim Song) |
2021 Spring Library Evolution PollsP2384: 2021 Spring Library Evolution Poll Outcomes POLL 5: Send P2321R1 (
Outcome: Consensus in favor. |
D2321R2 reviewed by LWG today. Approved with some minor changes to be checked by myself and Tomasz.
|
P2321R2 zip (Tim Song) |
Adopted 2021-10. |
P2321R0 zip (Tim Song)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: