New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2374 views::cartesian_product #1044
Comments
P2374R1 views::cartesian_product (Sy Brand) |
2021-01-06 Library Evolution Telecon Minutes Chair: Inbal Levi Champion: Sy Brand Minute Taker: Ben Craig Start: 2021-01-06 10:02 Pacific POLL: We would like to have special case relaxations on the requirements for the first underlying range in cartesian_product_view
Attendance: 28 Num of Authors: 1 Authors' Position: A Outcome: No Consensus to change POLL: We like the name "cartesian_product_view". Attendance: 28 Num of Authors: 1 Outcome: No objection to unanimous consent SummaryThe proposal generally had broad support, apart from few issues and clarifications, which will be fixed on the next revision: OutcomeThe next revision should address the design issues mentioned. The name "views::cartesian_product", "cartesian_product_view" was supported. |
Paper was seen by SG9 on 2021-10-11 POLL: We want cartisian_product to support special cases specified in section 3.8 of “D2374R2: cartesian_product_view”
Outcome: Consensus for. |
R2 of the paper was seen by SG9 on 2021-11-8. (Full Minutes) PollsPOLL: Forward P2374R2 views::cartesian_product to LEWG for C++23 Outcome: No Objection To Unanimous Consent OutcomeR2 of the paper was forwarded to LEWG for C++23. |
R0 was seen by LEWG on 2021-11-09. (Full Minutes) PollsPOLL: Modify “P23741R2 views::cartesian_product” by specifying the size requirements for the size and difference types as recommended practice and forward to LWG for C++23 with priority level 3 to be confirmed with library evolution electronic poll.
Attendance: 26 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: SF Outcome: Strong Consensus In Favor OutcomeR2 (+ typos fixes) will be forwarded to LWG for C++23, priority 3 (addition) (to be confirmed with electronic poll). |
P2374R2 views::cartesian_product (Sy Brand, Michał Dominiak) |
P2374R3 views::cartesian_product (Sy Brand, Michał Dominiak) |
2021-12 Library Evolution Electronic Poll OutcomesPOLL: Send [P2374R3] (views::cartesian_product) to Library Working Group for C++23, classified as an addition ([P0592R4] bucket 3 item).
Consensus in favor, forwarded to LWG |
LWG reviewed this again today and asked for a few more edits. We'll see it again next week. |
LWG reviewed and approved 2022-07-08 poll: Put p2374r4 into C++23?
|
P2374R4 views::cartesian_product (Sy Brand, Michał Dominiak) |
P2374R0 views::cartesian_product (Sy Brand)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: