New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2465 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat #1115
Comments
2021-10-12 Library Evolution TeleconP2465R0: Standard Library Modules 2021-10-12 Library Evolution Telecon Minutes Chair: Bryce Adelstein Lelbach Champion: Stephan T Lavavej Minute Taker: Steve Downey Start: 2021-10-12 10:09 Pacific Does this proposal have:
Topics to Polls:
POLL: Provide both
Attendance: 30 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 3 x SF Outcome: Consensus in favor. POLL: Provide both
Attendance: 30 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 2 x SA, 1 x N Outcome: No consensus. POLL: Provide the following standard library modules (vote once):
Attendance: 31 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 3 x A Outcome: Option (A) has the stronger consensus. POLL: The
Attendance: 31 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 3 x SF Outcome: Consensus in favor. POLL: The
Attendance: 28 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 3 x SF Outcome: Weak consensus in favor. POLL: The
Attendance: 28 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 1 x WA, 2 x SA Outcome: Consensus against. POLL: The
Attendance: 28 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 1 x WA, 2 x SA Outcome: No consensus. SA: I find it harder to read without punctuation in the middle. That's why I POLL: The
Attendance: 28 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 3 x SF Outcome: No consensus. POLL: The
Attendance: 28 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 1 x N, 2 x WF Outcome: Consensus in favor. POLL: Modify P2465R0 (Standard Library Modules
Attendance: 27 # of Authors: 3 Author Position: 3 x SF Outcome: Consensus in favor. WA: I don't think WA & SA: I am against the land grab of End: 11:28 SummaryWe reviewed P2465R0 (Standard Library Modules During our last discussion of this topic, we determined that we wanted a module that only exported the names in Today, we discussed whether we should have a second module which either
We had a preference for first option, a We also concluded our discussion about how these modules should be named. First, we decided that the The naming of the Ultimately, we only had consensus for the OutcomeLibrary Evolution sends P2465R0 (Standard Library Modules |
P2465R1 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat (Stephan T. Lavavej, Gabriel Dos Reis, Bjarne Stroustrup, Jonathan Wakely) |
2021-11 Library Evolution Electronic Poll OutcomesPoll 1: Send [P2465R1] (Standard Library Modules std And std.compat) to Library Working Group for C++23, classified as a focus ([P0592R4] bucket 1 item).
Consensus in favor |
The paper contains Core changes. |
Reviewed in CWG telecon 2022-01-27: Needs revision. |
I have submitted P2465R2 for the next mailing, containing minor Core wording changes. I would like to ask where this is on the LWG review schedule (which shouldn't need to block on CWG review) - is this the right place or should I ask on the reflector? |
@StephanTLavavej , please e-mail Jonathan Wakely and Jeff Garland for LWG scheduling concerns. |
LWG review is planned for 2022-02-18. |
LWG reviewed and approved for c++23. Notes: https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2022/P2465-20220218 poll: Adopt P2465R2 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat for c++23
|
P2465R2 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat (Stephan T. Lavavej, Gabriel Dos Reis, Bjarne Stroustrup, Jonathan Wakely) |
CWG review is planned for 2022-03-11. |
CWG telecon 2022-03-11: Approved D2465R3 |
With CWG and LWG both complete setting ready for the next plenary vote. Library will move this paper. |
P2465R3 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat (Stephan T. Lavavej, Gabriel Dos Reis, Bjarne Stroustrup, Jonathan Wakely) |
P2465R0 Standard Library Modules std and std.all (Stephan T. Lavavej, Gabriel Dos Reis, Bjarne Stroustrup, Jonathan Wakely)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: