@jwakely @JeffGarland Is that something LWG should look at directly?

No, I think we need to look at it in Library Evolution in a mailing list review at least.

No, I think we need to look at it in Library Evolution in a mailing list review at least.

Yes please

2022-02-22 Library Evolution Telecon

P2517R0: Add a conditional noexcept specification to apply

2022-02-22 Library Evolution Telecon Minutes

Chair: Billy Baker

Minute Taker: Ben Craig

POLL: Send P2517R0 (Add a conditional noexcept specification to std::apply) to LWG for C++23 classified as B2 (to be confirmed with a Library Evolution electronic poll).

Attendance: 20

# of Authors: 0

Author Position:

Outcome: Strong consensus to send to electronic polling.

Consistency between apply and make_from_tuple was brought up since both use std::get. However, this concern did not result in any against votes.

2022-05 Library Evolution Electronic Poll Outcomes

POLL: Send [P2517R0] Add A Conditional noexcept Specification To apply to Library Working Group for C++23, classified as an improvement of an existing feature ([P0592R4] bucket 2 item).

Unanimous consensus in favor.

LWG reviewed and approved 2022-07-08

https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2022/P2517-20220708

poll: Put P1899r1 as changed above (and checked by JG and JW) into C++23?

edit: fix version

poll: Put P1899r3 as changed above (and checked by JG and JW) into C++23?

This is a typo in the minutes, the poll was for P2517R1

P2517R1 Add a conditional noexcept specification to std::apply (Hewill Kang)