New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2542 R8 views::concat #1204
Comments
Was seen by SG9 (Ranges) on 2022-03-14 (Full Minutes) PollsNo polls were taken. SummaryPaper is in good shape. Needs revision addresses the topics of: (Whether to) Fix 4.5 Common Range, usage of common_reference_with. We will take a poll on the next revision. |
P2542R1 views::concat (Hui Xie, S. Levent Yilmaz) |
R1 was seen by SG9 (Ranges) on 2022-04-11 (Full Minutes) PollsNo polls were taken. SummaryThe issue of usage of common_reference_with with prvalue, xvalues, and the ownership was brought up. |
R2 was seen by SG9 (Ranges) on 2022-05-09 (Full Minutes) PollsPOLL: Forward “P2542R2: views::concat” to LEWG for C++26.
Author’s position: 2xSF SummaryRevision addresses the topics of usage of common_reference_with. |
P2542R2 views::concat (Hui Xie, S. Levent Yilmaz) |
A motion was made on 2022-06-14 on the Library Evolution mailing list to advance this paper directly to electronic polling. The motion passed with 5 +1s. |
2022-07 Library Evolution Electronic Poll OutcomesPoll 2.5: Send [P2542R2] views::concat to Library Working Group for C++26, classified as an addition ([P0592R4] bucket 3 item).
Outcome: Unanimous consensus in favor. |
2023-09-19 Library Evolution TeleconLEWG discussed "P2542R6: Champion: Levent Yilmaz Chair: Ben Craig Minute Taker: Guy Davidson SummaryPOLL: Change concat-is-random-access and concat-is-bidi requirements from (common_range or sized_range) to only common_range
Attendance: 22 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: WF Outcome: Consensus WA: Rather have complexity in implementation rather than user code for corner cases Next StepsR6 + changes was voted on and was sent back to LWG. The poll on views::concat R5 in LEWG electronic poll will be replaced with R7 and postponed to the next LEWG electronic poll (which currently contains R5) |
P2542R6 views::concat (Hui Xie, S. Levent Yilmaz) |
LWG reviewed and approved in Tokyo. Poll: put P2542r8 into C++26?
|
P2542R8 views::concat (Hui Xie, S. Levent Yilmaz) |
P2542R0 views::concat (Hui Xie, S. Levent Yilmaz)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: