-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
P3296 R4 let_async_scope #1948
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
2024-06-24 SG1 St. Louis MeetingP3296R1 let_async_scope 2024-06-24 SG1 in St Louis Minutes SummaryPoll 1: Poll 2: Next StepsRequire more discussion in SG1 (@ogiroux - please confirm). |
P3296R1 let_with_async_scope (Anthony Williams) |
P3296R2 let_async_scope (Anthony Williams) |
P3296R3 let_async_scope (Anthony Williams) |
2025-02-11 Library Evolution Hagenberg MeetingP3296R3: let_async_scope 2025-02-11 Library Evolution Hagenberg Minutes Champion: Anthony Williams / Ian SummaryACTION: Make “state-type” expo only type, remove the mutex (or replace it with atomic or explicitly specify the order) and get SG1’s wording except feedback on the phrasing. ACTION: Modify the paper so that the environment provided to scope sender is propagated (special token is type scope_token) ACTION: apply fixes and phrase the asynch scope concept. POLL: Phrase asynchronous-scope concept (to be approved by LEWG, in reflector/telecon), apply the changes above and forward P3296R4 to LWG for C++26.
Attendance: 13 (IP) + 7 (R) Next StepsPhrase asynchronous-scope concept (to be approved by LEWG, in reflector/telecon), apply the changes above and forward P3296R4 to LWG for C++26. |
P3296R4 let_async_scope (Anthony Williams) |
P3296R0 let_with_async_scope (Anthony Williams)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: