New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subnormal instead of denormal #1017
Comments
Is there a copy of IEEE-754 2008 available somewhere so that I can verify the claims? |
It's probably worth having an index entry for "denormal" still, which refers to subnormal. I'm not sure what to do about the traits though! Create a new one named subnormal, duplicating the original one? |
The trait has been like that for 20+ years, nobody really reported being
confused. Any change now is more likely to introduce confusion and harm
for no real benefit.
…On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:21 AM, JF Bastien ***@***.***> wrote:
It's probably worth having an index entry for "denormal" still, which
refers to subnormal. I'm not sure what to do about the traits though!
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1017 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRUvcaF0M53k_MeachS7EoRdVbs-apBks5rGDymgaJpZM4KwnlC>
.
|
@sigfpe any new trait needs to be in a paper and isn't editorial. The wording of the standard, however, should be editorially updated to reflect the new reference to the 2008 version of IEEE-754. |
Also add index entries for 'denormalized value' and 'value, denormalized', pointing to 'number, subnormal'. Fixes cplusplus#1017.
As a follow-up to #1009: IEEE-754 2008 uses "subnormal" instead of "denormal". Since C++ refers to the 2008 version, we should use the same naming.
See its section 2.1.51 for the definition. See 2.1.15 for "denormalized number: See: subnormal number."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: