Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harmonize formatting of 'cv-qualified' #1025

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 13, 2016
Merged

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented Nov 13, 2016

Fixes #798.

@@ -4146,7 +4146,7 @@
a \term{cv-unqualified type}. Each type which is a
cv-unqualified complete or incomplete object type or is
\tcode{void}~(\ref{basic.types}) has three corresponding cv-qualified
versions of its type: a \grammarterm{const-qualified} version, a
versions of its type: a \term{const-qualified} version, a
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have an index entry for this? Should this be \defnx instead of \term?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't have an index entry for "const-qualified".
All the other terms defined in that same sentence are just \term{volatile-qualified}, for example, so I just wanted to fix this particular bump.
I suggest to go forward with this (it's an obvious improvement).

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit b7b273f into cplusplus:master Nov 13, 2016
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the foo26 branch November 13, 2016 20:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants