Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[utility] shorten stable names #1048

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 17, 2016
Merged

[utility] shorten stable names #1048

merged 1 commit into from Nov 17, 2016

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented Nov 15, 2016

memory.resource -> mem.res
optional.bad_optional_access -> optional.badaccess
memory.polymorphic -> mem.poly
func.searchers -> func.search
... boyer_moore -> ... bm
... boyer_moore_horspool -> ... bmh

Fixes #794.

memory.resource -> mem.res
optional.bad_optional_access -> optional.badaccess
memory.polymorphic -> mem.poly
func.searchers -> func.search
... boyer_moore -> ... bm
... boyer_moore_horspool -> ... bmh
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Nov 15, 2016

I like it. Will leave to @zygoloid to make the final call.

@jlaire
Copy link

jlaire commented Nov 15, 2016

optional.bad.access would be like the existing variant.bad.access

@timsong-cpp
Copy link
Contributor

"memory.polymorphic" is always followed by ".allocator". Why not shorten all three to "mem.poly.alloc"?

@sigfpe
Copy link

sigfpe commented Nov 16, 2016

[sigfpe:] What is wrong with leaving it as is?

[removed e-mail headers -- Jens Maurer]

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

We have ".allocator" parts elsewhere, so it seems more consistent to leave them in.

@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit f8aec8f into cplusplus:master Nov 17, 2016
zygoloid pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2016
memory.resource -> mem.res
optional.bad_optional_access -> optional.badaccess
memory.polymorphic -> mem.poly
func.searchers -> func.search
... boyer_moore -> ... bm
... boyer_moore_horspool -> ... bmh
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants