Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[numeric] Order elements correctly #1070

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 18, 2016

Conversation

AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

This is the analog to ballot comment JP-21, ordering the
Requires/Effects/Returns clauses correctly through clause
26. A couple of re-orderings are deliberately skipped,
due to a dependency in the wording, introducing terms in
the out-of-order elements.

This is the analog to ballot comment JP-21, ordering the
Requires/Effects/Returns clauses correctly through clause
26.  A couple of re-orderings are deliberately skipped,
due to a dependency in the wording, introducing terms in
the out-of-order elements.
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit bffe152 into cplusplus:master Nov 18, 2016
tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2016
This is the analog to ballot comment JP-21, ordering the
Requires/Effects/Returns clauses correctly through clause
26.  A couple of re-orderings are deliberately skipped,
due to a dependency in the wording, introducing terms in
the out-of-order elements.
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the reorder_numeric_paragraphs branch November 18, 2016 18:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants