Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

== operator vs operator == (and similar cases) #109

Closed
sdutoit opened this issue May 10, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

== operator vs operator == (and similar cases) #109

sdutoit opened this issue May 10, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@sdutoit
Copy link
Contributor

sdutoit commented May 10, 2013

Throughout the core clauses, especially in [expr], we are inconsistent in how we refer to operators. Pick a style and run with it.

Examples:

[expr.add]:

The additive operators + and -

[expr.add]:

... the binary + operator ...

[expr.eq]:

The == (equal to) and the != (not equal to) operators

[expr.log.and]:

The && operator groups left-to-right.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Nov 13, 2016
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Editorial meeting consensus: More consistency doesn't seem to help comprehension of the standard. No harmonization required.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Mar 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sdutoit @jensmaurer