Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[iterator.requirements.general] Rephrase definition of 'writable to' #1101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 23, 2016

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

for output iterators.

Fixes #698.

\term{writable}
to the particular iterator type of
\tcode{i}.
All output iterators \tcode{i} have a non-empty set of types that are
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think the plural works here. How about "An output iterator i has a non-empty set..."?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

I've pushed an update that addresses your concern, @tkoeppe. I do want to point out that the surrounding text uses "All ... iterators...", although I do agree singular would be better everywhere.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Nov 23, 2016

Indeed it does... maybe we can change those ambient uses, too? They sound pretty weird at the moment. Cross-check with C++98 if this got grandfathered in; I'd be happy to improve the text at this point.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Here you are. I haven't checked C++98 yet, but the LaTeX there was one-word-per-line, which suggests troff heritage.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Nov 23, 2016

Thanks, much better!

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit bb03cce into cplusplus:master Nov 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants