Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[class.virtual] Remove awkward 'but'. #1182

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 7, 2016
Merged

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes #170.

@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@
\pnum
\indextext{definition!virtual~function}%
A virtual function declared in a class shall be defined, or declared
pure~(\ref{class.abstract}) in that class, or both; but no diagnostic is
pure~(\ref{class.abstract}) in that class, or both; no diagnostic is
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you declare a function "abstract"? I thought functions are "pure" and classes are abstract.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The "pure" thing is explained a bit more in [class.abstract]. Nothing in the normative text suggests a function can be abstract.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Never mind, I misread that, "abstract" only appears in the label, not in the text.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit ff91738 into cplusplus:master Dec 7, 2016
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the b8 branch December 7, 2016 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants