Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[numeric.special] Remove redundant 'inline' specifiers in example. #1192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 8, 2016
Merged

[numeric.special] Remove redundant 'inline' specifiers in example. #1192

merged 1 commit into from Dec 8, 2016

Conversation

Eelis
Copy link
Contributor

@Eelis Eelis commented Dec 8, 2016

'inline' is doubly redundant here because these member functions are defined inside the class definition as well as constexpr.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 8, 2016

@jensmaurer, @jwakely: Does this look legit?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me. "inline" is mostly noise on the semantic level, anyway.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit a9159bd into cplusplus:master Dec 8, 2016
@Eelis Eelis deleted the redundantinline branch December 8, 2016 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@Eelis @tkoeppe @jensmaurer