Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Footnote 133 should be reimagined #1232

Closed
tkoeppe opened this issue Dec 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Footnote 133 should be reimagined #1232

tkoeppe opened this issue Dec 14, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 14, 2016 •
edited

The current footnote 133 (attached to [over.match.best]p10) is a bit overweight. Three paragraphs and custom code block formatting (with examples in the code comments!).

@zygoloid says:

the second paragraph (!) of the footnote seems like a regular note and example to me

the third paragraph seems overly tutorialesque

Suggestions for rewording welcome.
This was referenced Dec 14, 2016
Closed
Closed
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkoeppe commented Dec 14, 2016

@jensmaurer: I'm sorry, I had completely missed the fact that you had already proposed new wording for this. Sorry for the duplication!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tkoeppe