We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should the simplification from https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/#!topic/std-discussion/hFSv84WY14o (which pointed out awhile ago that [expr.cond]/4.3.1 is redundant) be applied to [expr.cond]/4.3 as an editorial? That wall of text could use any simplification it can get.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closing; we don't need to have both this and #1374 open. A pull request is as good as a (non-PR) issue for this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
jensmaurer
No branches or pull requests
Should the simplification from https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/#!topic/std-discussion/hFSv84WY14o (which pointed out awhile ago that [expr.cond]/4.3.1 is redundant) be applied to [expr.cond]/4.3 as an editorial? That wall of text could use any simplification it can get.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: