We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The following two fragments are from [except.ctor]/2 and [temp.class.order]/2, respectively:
Note how the #1/#2 are in body font in the first, and in code font in the second.
#1
#2
(Also, the A/B/C/Din the second fragment should probably not be in code font.)
A
B
C
D
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We don't do #1 -style references very often, it seems, but where we have them, \tcode is the exception. We usually just have body font #1 references.
That suggests point-fixes for the few issues discovered above as opposed to broad harmonization.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Use body font, not \tcode, for '#1' code line references in running t…
cb41416
…ext. Fixes cplusplus#1375.
9085097
…ext. (#1383) Fixes #1375.
jensmaurer
No branches or pull requests
The following two fragments are from [except.ctor]/2 and [temp.class.order]/2, respectively:
Note how the
#1
/#2
are in body font in the first, and in code font in the second.(Also, the
A
/B
/C
/D
in the second fragment should probably not be in code font.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: