Fix index entries for 'nested/local class'. #1463
Conversation
|
|
||
| \pnum | ||
| A class can be declared within another class. A class declared within | ||
| another is called a \grammarterm{nested} class. The name of a nested class | ||
| another is called a \defnx{nested}{nested class} class. The name of a nested class | ||
| is local to its enclosing class. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The defined phrase is actually "nested class", so I'd like to see both words in italics. (Same for "local class".)
| @@ -1387,12 +1387,11 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| \rSec2[class.nest]{Nested class declarations}% | |||
| \indextext{definition!nested class}% | |||
| \indextext{class local|see{local class}}% | |||
| \indextext{class nested|see{nested class}} | |||
| \indextext{class!nested|see{nested class}} | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In general, it seems to me we gravitate towards "class!nested" as the main index entry (where all the page numbers go) and have "nested class" as the "see ..." entry.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Both "local class" and "nested class" have a bunch of subentries:
Should these be moved under "class, local" and "class, nested", respectively, as well, or stay where they are?
I guess an argument for moving them is that otherwise, if there is only a "local class"-->"class, local" redirect, then someone might find "class, local" in the index and never receive a clue that there are also relevant index entries under "local class" to look at.
diffs.pdf