Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missing cross-references to INVOKE in Clause 20 #1480

Closed
jwakely opened this issue Feb 20, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Missing cross-references to INVOKE in Clause 20 #1480

jwakely opened this issue Feb 20, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Feb 20, 2017

We have a couple of things in Clause 20 which refer to INVOKE which is not defined until 20.14.3:

  • 20.7.7 [variant.visit]
  • 20.5.3.5 [tuple.apply]

They should probably have cross-references to the definition of INVOKE.

The only other references to INVOKE outside its own sub-clause are in the requirements tables for type traits is_callable, is_nothrow_callable and result_of.
@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

INVOKE is also used in packaged_task without a cross-reference. All other uses I found in clause 30 had a cross-reference though.

jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Jul 15, 2017
@jensmaurer
[variant.visit], [tuple.apply], [futures.task.members] add cross-refe…
cbd8f01 
…rences for INVOKE to [func.require]

Fixes cplusplus#1480.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Jul 15, 2017
Merged
zygoloid pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 15, 2017
@jensmaurer @zygoloid
[variant.visit], [tuple.apply], [futures.task.members] add cross-refe…
b63b10a 
…rences for INVOKE to [func.require]

Fixes #1480.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@AlisdairM @jwakely