You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an aside, it's a shame that most [class.xxx] tags are for core wording relating to classes, except for a small handful of library types, [class.gslice], [class.slice], [class.directory_entry], [class.rec.dir.itr], [class.directory_iterator], [class.file_status], [class.filesystem_status], [class.path]. slice and gslice have been there since C++11 (before then they were [lib.class.*]) but all the others are new in C++17 and could be changed now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to change:
[enum.copy_options] -> [fs.enum.copy.opts]
[enum.directory_options] -> [fs.enum.dir.opts]
[enum.file_type] -> [fs.enum.file.type]
[enum.perms] -> [fs.enum.perms]
[directory_iterator.*] -> [fs.dir.itr.*]
Any objections? Any other candidates?
As an aside, it's a shame that most [class.xxx] tags are for core wording relating to classes, except for a small handful of library types, [class.gslice], [class.slice], [class.directory_entry], [class.rec.dir.itr], [class.directory_iterator], [class.file_status], [class.filesystem_status], [class.path]. slice and gslice have been there since C++11 (before then they were [lib.class.*]) but all the others are new in C++17 and could be changed now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: