Correct pasto in 14.7.3 example #152
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sdutoit
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2013
[temp.expl.spec]/6 Fix types in example. Thanks to Jason Merrill! Editorial since this is in an example (which are non normative) and the fix seems like obviously the right one!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Roger Orr asked me to explain how the specialization of A::S could be ill-formed with an int underlying type; the answer is that the underlying type was a copy/paste error in the example. This patch fixes that error.
This change seems to be on the border of editorial and technical; my guess was that since I wrote the example in the first place I can correct an obvious error, but I'm happy to take it to Core if that seems more appropriate to you.