Skip to content

Second sentence of 1.10p6 is redundant #159

Closed
@hboehm

Description

@hboehm

Please delete

"If A and B are modifications of an atomic object M and A happens before (as defined below) B, then A shall precede B in the modification order of M, which is defined below. [ Note: This states that the modification orders must respect the “happens before” relationship. —end note ]"

from 1.10p6 [intro.multithread]. The normative sentence is redundant with 1.10p15. There seems to be a concensus among SG1 commentators that it's not worth preserving the note, which seems a bit shallow. It could also be added to p15 or integrated into p19.

Activity

hboehm

hboehm commented on Jul 31, 2013

@hboehm
Author

We did have one dissenting vote from Ville for keeping the note. The other 4 opinions seemed to weakly favor dropping it.

jensmaurer

jensmaurer commented on Nov 12, 2016

@jensmaurer
Member

This is now 1.10.1 [intro.races] p4 and p13.

added 2 commits that reference this issue on Nov 12, 2016
eed91bc
bf05d04
added a commit that references this issue on Nov 12, 2016
4bcaad2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      Participants

      @hboehm@jensmaurer

      Issue actions

        Second sentence of 1.10p6 is redundant · Issue #159 · cplusplus/draft