Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[any.nonmembers] fix LWG2769 by merging with #1220 #1628

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 18, 2017
Merged

[any.nonmembers] fix LWG2769 by merging with #1220 #1628

merged 1 commit into from May 18, 2017

Conversation

lichray
Copy link
Contributor

@lichray lichray commented May 16, 2017

No description provided.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented May 18, 2017

I'm not sure what I'm looking at here. Are you proposing a change to the DR? This doesn't seem to be editorial.

@lichray
Copy link
Contributor Author

lichray commented May 18, 2017

It is editorial, ValueType is already a dangling reference in this paragraph (has been changed to T in the signature.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented May 18, 2017

Ah understood. I'll take care of it, thanks.

@jwakely jwakely self-assigned this May 18, 2017
@jwakely jwakely merged commit 8c00547 into cplusplus:master May 18, 2017
@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented May 18, 2017

FTR 71f89fd caused this regression.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@jwakely jwakely

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@lichray @jwakely