Closed
Description
From an email by Jeffrey Yasskin:
Many functions in the strings clause use formulations like:
[string.cons]/15:
Effects: Same as basic_string(il.begin(), il.end(), a).
[string.capacity]/15:
Effects: Behaves as if the function calls:
erase(begin(), end());
[string::insert]/27:
Effects: insert(p, il.begin(), il.end()).
Returns: [what the above insert() call returns]
instead of the "Equivalent to" wording defined in
[structure.specifications]/4. These should all be changed to
"Equivalent to" for consistency and conciseness.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Type
Projects
Relationships
Development
No branches or pull requests
Activity
burblebee commentedon Apr 15, 2016
This needs to be opened as an LWG issue. I've asked for an issue to be opened for this throughout the spec, but I don't know it's number yet.
jensmaurer commentedon Dec 9, 2016
LWG 2679, but that doesn't cover the places mentioned above.
jensmaurer commentedon Dec 9, 2016
I've asked for another LWG issue, explicitly listing the places that need fixing.
jensmaurer commentedon Dec 18, 2016
LWG 2841