New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editorial: difference between "well defined" and "well-defined"? #1675
Comments
According to #1587, it’s supposed to be hyphenated when it’s an adjective. The grammar is slightly different in the cases without a hyphen. |
If the difference is intentional, then this can be closed as NAD. I just want to make searching the standard easier ;-) |
The style guide says that "well-defined" is the way to spell the adjective. The new cases of "well defined" seem to have come in via recent motions; I assume LWG reviewed those before we added the style guide entry. |
Duplicate of #1618. |
Uh, sorry, #1618 is about well-formed, this issue is about well-defined. |
The standard uses 'well defined' in 7 different places.
It uses "well-defined" (with a hyphen) in 64 places.
A quick look at the seven suggests that most of them could be replaced with 'well-defined', increasing the consistency of the standard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: