Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: difference between "well defined" and "well-defined"? #1675

Closed
mclow opened this issue Jul 19, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Editorial: difference between "well defined" and "well-defined"? #1675

mclow opened this issue Jul 19, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@mclow
Copy link
Contributor

mclow commented Jul 19, 2017

The standard uses 'well defined' in 7 different places.
It uses "well-defined" (with a hyphen) in 64 places.

A quick look at the seven suggests that most of them could be replaced with 'well-defined', increasing the consistency of the standard.

@mclow mclow changed the title difference between "well defined" and "well-defined"? Editorial: difference between "well defined" and "well-defined"? Jul 19, 2017
@dhouck
Copy link

dhouck commented Jul 19, 2017

According to #1587, it’s supposed to be hyphenated when it’s an adjective. The grammar is slightly different in the cases without a hyphen.

@mclow
Copy link
Contributor Author

mclow commented Jul 19, 2017

If the difference is intentional, then this can be closed as NAD. I just want to make searching the standard easier ;-)

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Jul 19, 2017

The style guide says that "well-defined" is the way to spell the adjective. The new cases of "well defined" seem to have come in via recent motions; I assume LWG reviewed those before we added the style guide entry.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Jul 21, 2017

Duplicate of #1618.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Jul 21, 2017
@jensmaurer jensmaurer marked this as a duplicate of #1618 Jul 28, 2017
@jensmaurer jensmaurer reopened this Jul 28, 2017
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Uh, sorry, #1618 is about well-formed, this issue is about well-defined.

jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2017
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Oct 19, 2017
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Oct 19, 2017
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the C++20 milestone Oct 19, 2017
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants