Agreed on both counts, though I don't think we use "letter" at the moment, either; we use "ebook". I have always wondered about that.

I think that means our response is REJECTED. We need to draft an explanation. How about:

"This change will be made for future revisions of this standard. For the current standard, this change would result in extensive formatting changes, invalidating existing National Body comments."

"... and potentially creating new objectionable formatting that NBs can no longer respond to."?

@tkoeppe: "we use "ebook". I have always wondered about that"

We wanted a paper size that has the width of A4 and the length of US letter, allowing printing on both US and A4 formats without chopping off parts of the text. Let's NOT do this for C++17, but change it for C++20 right now.

Well..... we could change the paper size but adjust the margins so that the column stays exactly the same, and we should get no change in the text flow. Printing could then also proceed as usual, just cropping differently. But we certainly don't have to do that.

This does however raise the more interesting question of whether a change of the individual dimensions is requested. If not, the request effectively amounts to adding whitespace at the top and bottom.

Actually, memoir's ebook size is 6" x 9", not related to letter (8.5" x 11").

For consideration post-C++17.

This has happened in 89842a3.