Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[complex.numbers] Use \xref for references to the C standard. #1828

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 26, 2017

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1822.

@@ -995,7 +995,8 @@

\pnum
\remarks
Behaves the same as the C function \tcode{cproj}, defined in 7.3.9.4.
Behaves the same as the C function \tcode{cproj}.
\xref ISO C 7.3.9.5
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to [structure.see.also], we use \xref only in paragraphs of their own (and they're unnumbered). This would be a novel use.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See my comment in #1822.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you ping Richard for an opinion?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zygoloid: Ping :-)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's go with this for now. It's clearly an improvement. But we should keep #1822 open to consider the consistency question.

@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit e2457df into cplusplus:master Nov 26, 2017
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the b18 branch November 26, 2017 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants