Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider removing [facets.examples] #1852

Closed
Eelis opened this issue Nov 26, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider removing [facets.examples] #1852

Eelis opened this issue Nov 26, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied.

Comments

@Eelis
Copy link
Contributor

Eelis commented Nov 26, 2017

In #781, @jensmaurer expressed serious doubts that [facets.examples] should exist in the standard. I have such doubts as well. Anyone else?

(In addition, the remaining \pnums in examples are an annoyance for cxxdraft-htmlgen.)

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Nov 28, 2017
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Editorial meeting consensus: Remove [facets.examples] entirely.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied. and removed decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. labels Mar 16, 2018
Eelis added a commit to Eelis/draft that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2018
Eelis added a commit to Eelis/draft that referenced this issue Mar 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants