Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GB-7: [container.requirements.general] Missing definitions in tables #186

Closed
sdutoit opened this issue Sep 19, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

GB-7: [container.requirements.general] Missing definitions in tables #186

sdutoit opened this issue Sep 19, 2013 · 1 comment
Labels
ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent.
Milestone
C++14 CD NB Response

Comments

@sdutoit
Copy link
Contributor

sdutoit commented Sep 19, 2013

N3733 GB-7 says:

Table 98 refers to a and b without defining them. Obviously they are the same as in Tables 96 and 97 but paragraph 23.2.1 / 4 fails to mention Table 98.

It goes on to propose:

Add Table 98 to the scope of paragraph 23.2.1 / 4: In Tables 96, 97 and 98, X denotes ...
@sdutoit
Copy link
Contributor Author

sdutoit commented Sep 24, 2013

LWG will put in a motion to put this forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
C++14 CD NB Response
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sdutoit