New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[string.cons] Editorial change for caption on table 56 #1875
Comments
Can I make a counter-proposal to just remove the tables outright and replace them with standard Postconditions elements? @zygoloid, would you support that? |
Those constructor postcondition tables are odd, and telling the reader the state of three data members doesn't seem overly obtuse to warrant separate tables. |
I believe at some point in the past there was one table that was shared between two |
LWG closed issue 3033 as "NAD editorial", with a suggestion that changing the caption on the table would be both editorial and sufficient.
The current caption is "
basic_string(const basic_string&)
effects"My first suggestion is: "
basic_string(const basic_string&)
andbasic_string(const basic_string&&)
effects", but I'm not going to insist on that.The discussion occurred on the -lib reflector in the thread titled "Issue 3033: basic_string move ctor is underspecified"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: