Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GB-11: [re.iter] Formatting of exposition-only members #188

Closed
sdutoit opened this issue Sep 19, 2013 · 0 comments
Closed

GB-11: [re.iter] Formatting of exposition-only members #188

sdutoit opened this issue Sep 19, 2013 · 0 comments
Labels
ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent.
Milestone
C++14 CD NB Response

Comments

@sdutoit
Copy link
Contributor

sdutoit commented Sep 19, 2013

N3733 GB-11 says:

17.5.2.3 [objects.within.classes] defines the use of "exposition only" in the library:
The declarations for such member objects and the definitions of related member types are followed by a comment that ends with exposition only,
28.12.1 [re.regiter] and 28.12.2 [re.tokiter] have members which are preceded (not followed) by a comment ending "exposition only".

It goes on to propose:

Reformat to follow 17.25.2.3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
C++14 CD NB Response
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sdutoit