Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[stmt.while] Generalize the equivalence for a declaration as the condition. #1931

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 2, 2018
Merged

[stmt.while] Generalize the equivalence for a declaration as the condition. #1931

merged 1 commit into from Apr 2, 2018

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1485.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. label Feb 17, 2018
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

jensmaurer commented Mar 15, 2018 •
edited

CWG in Jacksonville: add comment to example "condition" saying "declares t", otherwise approved.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Example updated as discussed by CWG. This is ready for merge.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. label Mar 17, 2018
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied. label Apr 1, 2018
@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit 73bfbf2 into cplusplus:master Apr 2, 2018
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the b11 branch April 2, 2018 06:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@joncaves joncaves joncaves approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@jensmaurer @joncaves @zygoloid