[temp.local] Fix example not to name the constructor. #1981

jensmaurer · 2018-03-23T22:57:06Z

Fixes #1900.

tkoeppe · 2018-03-30T15:15:34Z

source/templates.tex

@@ -4392,7 +4392,7 @@
 };

 template<class T, template<class> class U = T::template Base> struct Third { };
-Third<Base<int> > t;                    // OK: default argument uses injected-class-name as a template


I feel that we're breaking someone's in-joke here, but fine.

[temp.local] Fix example not to name the constructor.

8339f9e

zygoloid force-pushed the master branch from 1d8071e to 58382cb Compare March 30, 2018 00:55

tkoeppe reviewed Mar 30, 2018

View reviewed changes

tkoeppe merged commit fe4aa95 into cplusplus:master Mar 30, 2018

tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2018

[temp.local] Fix example not to name the constructor. (#1981)

174c44e

jensmaurer deleted the b45 branch March 30, 2018 20:23

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[temp.local] Fix example not to name the constructor. #1981

[temp.local] Fix example not to name the constructor. #1981

jensmaurer commented Mar 23, 2018

tkoeppe Mar 30, 2018

[temp.local] Fix example not to name the constructor. #1981

[temp.local] Fix example not to name the constructor. #1981

Conversation

jensmaurer commented Mar 23, 2018

tkoeppe Mar 30, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment