Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[temp.concept]: Use note; no syntax for explicit specialization, etc. #2010

Merged

Conversation

hubert-reinterpretcast
Copy link
Contributor

Explicit specialization, etc. of a concept cannot be formed
syntactically. As such, a further rule to prevent such constructs is
redundant as normative text.

Implements the proposed direction from core/2017/07/2719.

Explicit specialization, etc. of a concept cannot be formed
syntactically. As such, a further rule to prevent such constructs is
redundant as normative text.

Implements the proposed direction from core/2017/07/2719.
@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit 5b5d225 into cplusplus:master Apr 2, 2018
@hubert-reinterpretcast hubert-reinterpretcast deleted the temp_concept_p5_make_note branch April 2, 2018 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants