LWG 3105: library wording uses meaningless term "is convertible to" #2029
Labels
lwg
Issue must be reviewed by LWG.
not-editorial
Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.
Presumably when the library says "is convertible to" it means "is implicitly convertible to"? We should fix up all 40 instances of "is convertible to" in the library wording to say what they mean. (The library uses the form "
T1
is convertible toT2
", which is also wrong: expressions are / are not implicitly convertible to types, but it's not meaningful to convert one type to another type.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: