Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[basic.fundamental] is missing a definition of "fundamental type" #2095

Closed
jensmaurer opened this issue Jun 5, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

[basic.fundamental] is missing a definition of "fundamental type" #2095

jensmaurer opened this issue Jun 5, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jensmaurer
Milestone
C++20 IS

Comments

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

CWG in Rapperswil: Say at the end of 6.7.1 "The types described in the subclause are called /fundamental types/.

No objection to editorial handling from CWG.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title [basic.fundamental] is missing a definitino of "fundamental type" [basic.fundamental] is missing a definition of "fundamental type" Jun 5, 2018
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the C++20 milestone Jun 8, 2018
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2018
Merged
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Jun 28, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
C++20 IS
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jensmaurer