Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[temp.explicit] Restrictions on explicit instantiations are inconsistently placed #2188

Closed
jensmaurer opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2873
Closed

[temp.explicit] Restrictions on explicit instantiations are inconsistently placed #2188

jensmaurer opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2873
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Some restrictions (e.g. inline or constexpr) are in [temp.explicit], others are in the subclause discussing the respective other feature (e.g. [dcl.attr.grammar] for attributes).

Decide where we want to place the normative restrictions and consistently add notes to the "other" place.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Jun 15, 2018
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

@zygoloid, is that a CWG matter?

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Jun 15, 2018
Merged
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Nov 6, 2018
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Editorial meeting: This is editorial. [temp.explicit] should have the special rules in normative wording.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue May 5, 2019
Merged
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this May 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[dcl.dcl,temp.spec] Move normative statements on restrictions for jensmaurer/draft
1 participant
@jensmaurer