P1082R0 LWG Issues to be moved in Rapperswil (except issue 3071) #2193
Conversation
jensmaurer
force-pushed
the
motions-2018-06-lwg-11
branch
from
31b2230
to
076ae4e
Compare
|
Regarding P1082R0: Could you double-check that you've applied the edit to meta.trans.ptr? |
source/iostreams.tex
Outdated
| copied is operating system dependent. Creation failure because \tcode{p} resolves to an existing directory shall not be | ||
| treated as an error. | ||
| copied is operating system dependent. | ||
| Creation failure because \tcode{p} already exists is not treated as an error. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"treated as" should be deleted.
| \tcode{"\textmu{}s"} should be encoded as UTF-8. Otherwise UTF-16 or UTF-32 is encouraged. | ||
| The implementation may substitute other encodings, including \tcode{"us"}. | ||
| If \tcode{Period::type} is \tcode{micro}, | ||
| but the character U+00B5 cannot be represented in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I realize this is the requested wording, but is U+00B5 really how we say things? Wouldn't it be more like "the character whose character short name is B5"? Or just "the character MICRO SIGN"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@zygoloid, any guidance here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
U+00B5 is really how the Unicode standard says things. See http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode11.0.0/appA.pdf
I see no reason to deviate from the relevant normative reference's notational convention here. Using U+00B5 MICRO SIGN (with MICRO SIGN in small-caps) seems OK too. I'm going to take this as-is for now.
|
@tkoeppe: I did not update meta.trans.ptr, because common_type is in meta.trans.other. Furthermore, the underlying text has changed quite a bit here, the salient parts are now in "Note A" and "Note B", below the table. I think I did the best I could given the incoming text, but feel free to make specific improvement suggestions. |
Some of the underlying text has changed, and the edits were applied to the changed text. There is one remaining appearance of 'user-defined type' in [namespace.std], which was not changed.
zygoloid
force-pushed
the
motions-2018-06-lwg-11
branch
from
a28db44
to
9a5f7e9
Compare
zygoloid
force-pushed
the
motions-2018-06-lwg-11
branch
from
9a5f7e9
to
e33f7fa
Compare
|
I believe Thomas's comments have all been addressed, and I've done a review pass myself. LWG2139 is a bit of a merge conflict disaster, but I've convinced myself we've made all the requested changes. |
Fixes #2129.