You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the algorithm synopsis, the declarations of the "partitions" (is_partitioned, partition, stable_partition, partition_copy, and partition_point) precede the declarations of the other "Sorting and related operations" (sort, nth_element, etc.) whereas the specifications of the "partitions" are located in [alg.partitions], smack in the middle of [alg.sorting], between [alg.binary.search] and [alg.merge].
I believe that:
the ordering should be consistent, and
the synopsis should be fixed to agree with the ordering of the detailed specifications.
If people agree with (1), I'll submit a PR. The exact form of that PR will depend on whether or not people agree with (2).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
between the "binary_search" family and the "merge" family, to agree with
the order of the detailed specifiations as reordered by cplusplus#1245.
Fixescplusplus#2218.
In the algorithm synopsis, the declarations of the "partitions" (
is_partitioned
,partition
,stable_partition
,partition_copy
, andpartition_point
) precede the declarations of the other "Sorting and related operations" (sort
,nth_element
, etc.) whereas the specifications of the "partitions" are located in [alg.partitions], smack in the middle of [alg.sorting], between [alg.binary.search] and [alg.merge].I believe that:
If people agree with (1), I'll submit a PR. The exact form of that PR will depend on whether or not people agree with (2).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: