Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[expr.new]p1 is too generic in its wording #2279

Closed
languagelawyer opened this issue Jul 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

[expr.new]p1 is too generic in its wording #2279

languagelawyer opened this issue Jul 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@languagelawyer
Copy link
Contributor

The new-expression can create only objects, but the paragraph uses the term "entities" to refer to them. Whilst objects are entities and it is formally correct, I do not see a reason to use umbrella term when there is only one kind of entity involved.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jensmaurer @languagelawyer