Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[allocator.uses.construction] Rephrase note on uses-allocator construction #2384

Closed
jwakely opened this issue Nov 6, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

[allocator.uses.construction] Rephrase note on uses-allocator construction #2384

jwakely opened this issue Nov 6, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Nov 6, 2018

LWG suggested rephrasing the note at the end of [allocator.uses.construction]

Currently:

[Note: An error will result if uses_allocator_v<T, Alloc> is true but the specific constructor does not take an allocator. This definition prevents a silent failure to pass the allocator to an element. — end note]

Suggested:

[Note: This definition prevents a silent failure to pass the allocator to an element of a type for which uses_allocator_v<T, Alloc> is true. — end note]
@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title Rephrase note on uses-allocator construction [allocator.uses.construction] Rephrase note on uses-allocator construction Nov 7, 2018
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

[allocator.uses.construction] p5 seems to now have a better phrasing, based on the San Diego papers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jwakely @jensmaurer