Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[dcl.attr.contract.check] redundant wording on implementation-defined nature of violation handler #2387

Closed
zygoloid opened this issue Nov 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

[dcl.attr.contract.check] redundant wording on implementation-defined nature of violation handler #2387

zygoloid opened this issue Nov 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

zygoloid commented Nov 7, 2018

(Via email from Nathan Myers.)

In 9.11.4.3 Checking contracts [dcl.attr.contract.check] / 5 we have:

The violation handler of a program is a function ... and is specified in an implementation-defined manner.

The latter part of this quote is redundant with subsequent text:

It is implementation-defined how the violation handler is established for a program

Suggest: Delete the redundant first part, starting at "and is".
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zygoloid @jensmaurer